0.05/0.11	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.05/0.11	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.10/0.31	% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
0.10/0.31	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.10/0.31	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.10/0.31	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.10/0.31	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.10/0.31	% CPULimit   : 1440
0.10/0.31	% WCLimit    : 180
0.10/0.31	% DateTime   : Thu Jul  4 09:25:53 EDT 2024
0.10/0.31	% CPUTime    : 
0.17/0.44	Running higher-order theorem proving
0.17/0.44	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.cYkm86Ad5H/E---3.1_28029.p
0.17/0.47	# Version: 3.2.0-ho
0.17/0.47	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
0.17/0.47	# Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.17/0.47	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 180s (1) cores
0.17/0.47	# Starting new_bool_9 with 180s (1) cores
0.17/0.47	# Starting post_as_ho1 with 180s (1) cores
0.17/0.47	# Starting post_as_ho4 with 180s (1) cores
0.17/0.47	# Starting post_as_ho2 with 180s (1) cores
0.17/0.47	# Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 180s (1) cores
0.17/0.47	# Starting full_lambda_10 with 180s (1) cores
0.17/0.47	# Starting new_ho_8 with 180s (1) cores
0.17/0.47	# post_as_ho12 with pid 28107 completed with status 0
0.17/0.47	# Result found by post_as_ho12
0.17/0.47	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
0.17/0.47	# Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.17/0.47	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 180s (1) cores
0.17/0.47	# No SInE strategy applied
0.17/0.47	# Search class: HGHSF-FFSF11-SSSFFMBN
0.17/0.47	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.17/0.47	# Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 98s (1) cores
0.17/0.47	# ho_unfolding_6 with pid 28115 completed with status 0
0.17/0.47	# Result found by ho_unfolding_6
0.17/0.47	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
0.17/0.47	# Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.17/0.47	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 180s (1) cores
0.17/0.47	# No SInE strategy applied
0.17/0.47	# Search class: HGHSF-FFSF11-SSSFFMBN
0.17/0.47	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.17/0.47	# Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 98s (1) cores
0.17/0.47	# Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.17/0.47	
0.17/0.47	# Proof found!
0.17/0.47	# SZS status Theorem
0.17/0.47	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.17/0.47	thf(decl_22, type, f: $i > $i).
0.17/0.47	thf(decl_23, type, a: $i).
0.17/0.47	thf(decl_24, type, cP: $i > $o).
0.17/0.47	thf(decl_25, type, esk1_1: ($i > $o) > $i).
0.17/0.47	thf(cTHM115A, conjecture, ?[X1:$i > $o]:((((![X2:$i, X3:$i]:((((X2)=(X3))<=((f @ X2)=(f @ X3))))&(cP @ a))=>?[X4:$i]:((X1 @ X4)))&![X2:$i]:(((cP @ X2)<=(X1 @ (f @ X2)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.cYkm86Ad5H/E---3.1_28029.p', cTHM115A)).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~(?[X1:$i > $o]:((((![X2:$i, X3:$i]:((((f @ X2)=(f @ X3))=>((X2)=(X3))))&(cP @ a))=>?[X4:$i]:((X1 @ X4)))&![X2:$i]:(((X1 @ (f @ X2))=>(cP @ X2)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM115A])])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X10:$i > $o, X11:$i, X12:$i, X13:$i]:((((((X10 @ (f @ (esk1_1 @ X10)))|(((f @ X11)!=(f @ X12))|((X11)=(X12))))&(~(cP @ (esk1_1 @ X10))|(((f @ X11)!=(f @ X12))|((X11)=(X12)))))&(((X10 @ (f @ (esk1_1 @ X10)))|(cP @ a))&(~(cP @ (esk1_1 @ X10))|(cP @ a))))&(((X10 @ (f @ (esk1_1 @ X10)))|~(X10 @ X13))&(~(cP @ (esk1_1 @ X10))|~(X10 @ X13))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i > $o, X2:$i]:(((X1 @ (f @ (esk1_1 @ X1)))|~((X1 @ X2)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i > $o, X2:$i, X3:$i]:(((X1 @ (f @ (esk1_1 @ X1)))|((X2)=(X3))|((f @ X2)!=(f @ X3)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:(((f @ (esk1_1 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:$i]:(((Z0)=(X2))))))=(X2))), inference(eliminate_leibniz_eq,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]), c_0_3])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i > $o, X2:$i]:((~((cP @ (esk1_1 @ X1)))|~((X1 @ X2)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i, X1:$i > $o]:((((esk1_1 @ (^[Z0/* 3 */:$i]:(((Z0)=(f @ X2)))))=(X2))|(X1 @ (f @ (esk1_1 @ X1))))), inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4, c_0_5])])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i > $o]:(((X1 @ (f @ (esk1_1 @ X1)))|(cP @ a))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i > $o, X2:$i]:(((X1 @ (f @ (esk1_1 @ X1)))|~((cP @ X2)))), inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6, c_0_7])])])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, (cP @ (f @ (esk1_1 @ cP))), inference(condense,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3, c_0_8])])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(flex_resolve,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9, c_0_10])]), ['proof']).
0.17/0.47	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.17/0.47	# Parsed axioms                        : 4
0.17/0.47	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
0.17/0.47	# Initial clauses                      : 9
0.17/0.47	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 3
0.17/0.47	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 6
0.17/0.47	# Processed clauses                    : 82
0.17/0.47	# ...of these trivial                  : 2
0.17/0.47	# ...subsumed                          : 45
0.17/0.47	# ...remaining for further processing  : 34
0.17/0.47	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 24
0.17/0.47	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.17/0.47	# Backward-subsumed                    : 0
0.17/0.47	# Backward-rewritten                   : 0
0.17/0.47	# Generated clauses                    : 498
0.17/0.47	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 449
0.17/0.47	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.17/0.47	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.17/0.47	# Paramodulations                      : 469
0.17/0.47	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.17/0.47	# NegExts                              : 0
0.17/0.47	# Equation resolutions                 : 28
0.17/0.47	# Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.17/0.47	# Total rewrite steps                  : 9
0.17/0.47	# ...of those cached                   : 6
0.17/0.47	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.17/0.47	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.17/0.47	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.17/0.47	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.17/0.47	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.17/0.47	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.17/0.47	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.17/0.47	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.17/0.47	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.17/0.47	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.17/0.47	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.17/0.47	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.17/0.47	# Current number of processed clauses  : 34
0.17/0.47	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1
0.17/0.47	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
0.17/0.47	#    Negative unit clauses             : 0
0.17/0.47	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 30
0.17/0.47	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 373
0.17/0.47	# ...number of literals in the above   : 926
0.17/0.47	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.17/0.47	# Current number of archived clauses   : 0
0.17/0.47	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 231
0.17/0.47	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 231
0.17/0.47	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 41
0.17/0.47	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 33
0.17/0.47	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.17/0.47	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 68
0.17/0.47	# BW rewrite match successes           : 35
0.17/0.47	# Condensation attempts                : 82
0.17/0.47	# Condensation successes               : 1
0.17/0.47	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 47804
0.17/0.47	# Search garbage collected termcells   : 145
0.17/0.47	
0.17/0.47	# -------------------------------------------------
0.17/0.47	# User time                : 0.018 s
0.17/0.47	# System time              : 0.002 s
0.17/0.47	# Total time               : 0.020 s
0.17/0.47	# Maximum resident set size: 1800 pages
0.17/0.47	
0.17/0.47	# -------------------------------------------------
0.17/0.47	# User time                : 0.019 s
0.17/0.47	# System time              : 0.005 s
0.17/0.47	# Total time               : 0.024 s
0.17/0.47	# Maximum resident set size: 1764 pages
0.17/0.47	% E---3.1 exiting
0.17/0.47	% E exiting
0.17/0.47	EOF